🚀 go-pugleaf

wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> 
> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
> his miserable existence. 

Proof please.



>  The last time I
> made a post like this 

You didn't post proof either.

FOAD


(about Human Leech and e-mail pest
> Kendrick) Louse-monkey Hausmann--or was it his clone, "Lousy
> MacLemon"?--started blathering about how *I* was "stupid" not
> to use an e-mail killfile.

Nope.  John suggested that you use a killfile.  I think you're stupid
for myriad reasons, the latest of which being that you can't figure out
that I'm using netscape 3.0 which doesn't have a killfile.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-M i k e  M a c L e n n a n -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

mmaclenn/atthingy/ix.netcom.com           defame/atthingy/wilhelp.com

      Want fame?  Say something stupid to reserve your space below.

     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; 
     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the 
     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
  
Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
 his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>

In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
<defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts: 
>
>wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> 
>> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
>> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
>> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
>> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
>> his miserable existence. 
>
>Proof please.

I doubt very seriously that the loser will deny it.
He knows better.  And I am certainly not going to 
post anything at the request of an ignorant, dishonest 
misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey Clone.

Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann, 
Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
game:

>     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; 
>     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the 
>     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
>      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.

I said it.  I stand by it one-hundred percent, even 
though I remind readers you have snipped out plenty
of helpful context, Lousy.   You STILL sound suspicially
like "crude entity" Louse-monkey Hausmann, as a matter
of fact, right down to your playing the same "snip and 
distort" game Hausmann favors!  Now, swear on your 
grandmother's false teeth again that you are not the 
Louse-monkey you grunt exactly like...
>  
>Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
> his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>

Lying again, eh Lousy?  The context you snipped made it
clear my point was that I don't feel obligated to "post
proof" about every reasonable suspician I have about
dishonest losers such as you and your Louse-monkey clone.


copyright FLAME GIANT

               On Wordscreens of the World
      

wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:

Coward.  <snicker>

> 
> In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
> <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts:
> >
> >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
> >> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
> >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
> >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
> >> his miserable existence.
> >
> >Proof please.
> 
> I doubt very seriously that the loser will deny it.
> He knows better.  And I am certainly not going to
> post anything at the request of an ignorant, dishonest
> misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey Clone.

Then shut up.  I may as well claim that I'm Salman Rushdie.  It's about
as believable.


Nice name-mangling BTW, hypocrite lad.

> 
> Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann,
> Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
> game:

Sadly, you just can't seem to stop putting those size 10 house shoes so
far down your throat that the E. coli in your intestine are giving you a
pedicure.  Stop saying incredibly stupid, hypocritical things, followed
by yet another unbelievable cry of "I can so flame", and perhaps some
day I'll let you off the hook.

> 
> >     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians";
> >     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the
> >     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
> >      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
> 
> I said it.  I stand by it one-hundred percent, even
> though I remind readers you have snipped out plenty
> of helpful context, Lousy.

The entire post is located at the Nutscum website, as well as (drumroll)
Dejanews.  Hell, Biil, be glad that I'm not putting your entire post in
my .sig.  This quote may make you look like a nattering dipshit, but the
entire quote makes you look like some latter day Mr. Magoo.  Stripped of
all of his charm and comedic timing perhaps, but equally as incompetent
and clueless.


>   You STILL sound suspicially
> like "crude entity" Louse-monkey Hausmann, as a matter
> of fact, right down to your playing the same "snip and
> distort" game Hausmann favors!

Mike sounds like John Hausmann, who sounds like Chuck Lunch, who sounds
like Dave Kendrick, who sounds like Mark Bullock, who sounds like Jamey
Powell, who sounds like Jeff Boyd, who sounds like Dr. Know it All, who
sounds like Raoul Xemblinosky, who sounds like Photoguy, who lived in
the house that Jack built.


Christ, Palmjob do you even realize how utterly doltish you look when
you pull this stunt?

Do you realize how utterly doltish you look even when you *don't* pull
this stunt?



> Now, swear on your
> grandmother's false teeth again that you are not the
> Louse-monkey you grunt exactly like...

Yes Biil, I have 18 ISPs in 4 countries and 26 states.  If it hadn't
been for the advent of 10-321 I'd be broke because I have nothing better
to do than run up thousands of dollars in long distance charges
(including international rates) in an attempt to confuse you.  There
are, in reality only Me, You, Wotan, Speedbump, and Chris Lewis on
Usenet.  Everybody else is simply an alias of mine managing to post 13
Gb per day.


There used to be six of us, but FyRE had a meltdown.


> >
> >Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
> > his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
> 
> Lying again, eh Lousy?  The context you snipped made it
> clear my point was that I don't feel obligated to "post
> proof" about every reasonable suspician I have about
> dishonest losers such as you and your Louse-monkey clone.

Biil, to you a reasonable "suspician" is that the Cockroaches that
inhabit the fetid bit of space you call home are actually mind control
devices planted by the aliens.


Enjoy the .sig, twit.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-M i k e  M a c L e n n a n -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

mmaclenn/atthingy/ix.netcom.com           defame/atthingy/wilhelp.com

      Want fame?  Say something stupid to reserve your space below.

     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; 
     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the 
     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
  
Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
 his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>

In <353C4BDF.6FCE@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike MacLennan
<defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> writes: 
>
>wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:

 In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
>> <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts:
>> >
>> >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
>> >> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
>> >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
>> >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
>> >> his miserable existence.
>> >
>> >Proof please.
>> 
>> I doubt very seriously that the loser will deny it.
>> He knows better.  And I am certainly not going to
>> post anything at the request of an ignorant, dishonest
>> misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey Clone.
>
>Then shut up.  I may as well claim that I'm Salman Rushdie. 

Please don't.   There is something especially distasteful
about a semi-literate, ignorant grunter such as yourself
claiming to be a world-famous author, Lousy.

 It's about
>as believable.

You grow stupider by the hour, Lousy.  Let's get
this staight.  You say that your claim to be Salman
Rushdie is "as believable" as my observation that
a misfit such as Dave T has been pestering me by
email?  In other words, your great faith in this
fine fellow with the fake name is such that you
can't imagine him behaving in such a pathetic
fashion...Well, I can; I saw his droolings show
up in my email.
>
>Nice name-mangling BTW, hypocrite lad.
>
>> Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann,
>> Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
>> game:
>
>Sadly, you just can't seem to stop putting those size 10 house shoes
so
>far down your throat that the E. coli in your intestine are giving you
a
>pedicure.  Stop saying incredibly stupid, hypocritical things,
followed
>by yet another unbelievable cry of "I can so flame", and perhaps some
>day I'll let you off the hook.

My, my, what a crude attempt to stand a situation on
its head!   All your "quote game" has EVER done was
expose your stupidity, Lousy.  You seem to have 
forgotten than each time you have quoted me you 
have either 1) misrepresented my remarks out of 
context, to distort them, or 2) taken a sentence
with a typo out of a lengthy article with very
few typos, or 3) merely repeated some astute
observation I made about you or your pals, in 
which case I merely pointed out that I stand by 
my remarks one hundred percent.  In all cases you 
lost, as is usual for a loser like YOU, MacLemon.
Your cheesy "snip and misrepresent" stunts have
gained you only further humiliation, since you
are apparently the only one who does not realize
that anyone could play "snip and misrepresent" 
with any prolific writer, on or off the net.
>
>> 
>> >     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians";
>> >     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the
>> >     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
>> >      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
>> 
>> I said it.  I stand by it one-hundred percent, even
>> though I remind readers you have snipped out plenty
>> of helpful context, Lousy.

THAT is what gets "snippers and distorters" every time!  
I'm not big on distancing myself from my factual 
observations about the Lousies of the net.

[...]  Lousy's droolings about quoting my entire
       post deleted.  Why doesn't the moron simply 
       repost my 1.5 million word Dejanews archive
       and stop playing "snip and distort?  But then,
       he has no talent, so he habitually relies on
       my words to improve the quality of his posts.
       I have said before, quite seriously, that I
       suspect that there are more words by ME in
       "MacLemon's archive" than there are words by
       him.  What better proof of his habitual
       parasitism could you ask for?  Ditto for
       Louse-menkey!  "Strange coincidence" of 
       course...

[...]
>

>>   You STILL sound suspicially
>> like "crude entity" Louse-monkey Hausmann, as a matter
>> of fact, right down to your playing the same "snip and
>> distort" game Hausmann favors!
>
> Louse-monkey you grunt exactly like "Lousy MacLemon"

Louse-monkey's (and Lousy's) obligatory "How could you ever 
be crazy enough to even SUSPECT me of posting under a phony 
name!" schtick deleted as incredibly feeble and repetitious.

copyright FLAME GIANT

              On Wordscreens of the World

In article <6hhfdo$3qm@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>, wilhelp@ix.netcom.com
() wrote:

> In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
> <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts: 
> >
> >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >> 
> >> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
> >> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
> >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
> >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
> >> his miserable existence. 
> >
> >Proof please.
> 
> I doubt very seriously that the loser will deny it.
> He knows better.  And I am certainly not going to 
> post anything at the request of an ignorant, dishonest 
> misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey Clone.
> 
> Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann, 
> Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
> game:
> 


Please advise me how to distort the <snicker> "word"
"suspicially" out of context, oh master <guffaw> of the usenet
faux pas.

-- 
Nope, Louse-monkey, it is just as I've been saying all along.  
You're a malign bastard. 

World Famous Usenet "writer", "my name is wilhelp"
wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) demonstrating 
his "skills" in <6cr8bc$9vs@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>

Mike MacLennan wrote:
> wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:

> >   You STILL sound suspicially
> > like "crude entity" Louse-monkey Hausmann, as a matter
> > of fact, right down to your playing the same "snip and
> > distort" game Hausmann favors!
> 
> Mike sounds like John Hausmann, who sounds like Chuck Lunch, who sounds
> like Dave Kendrick, who sounds like Mark Bullock, who sounds like Jamey
> Powell, who sounds like Jeff Boyd, who sounds like Dr. Know it All, who
> sounds like Raoul Xemblinosky, who sounds like Photoguy, who lived in
> the house that Jack built.

Well, he can't even figure out who WE sound like but he's
sure that we're one of them anyway!

> Christ, Palmjob do you even realize how utterly doltish you look when
> you pull this stunt?

Yes, but keep in mind that for Palmy "incredible dolt" is
a tremendous compliment.

-- 
D. C. & M. V. Sessions
sessions@primenet.com

In article <6hhfdo$3qm@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>,
  wilhelp@ix.netcom.com () wrote:
>
> In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
> <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts:
> >
> >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Just when I begin to thinKKK

THERE you go again, racist nazi Palmjob...

> a spineless loser like the phony-
> >> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
> >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
> >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
> >> his miserable existence.
> >
> >Proof please.
>
> I doubt very seriously that the loser will deny it.
> He knows better.  And I am certainly not going to
> post anything at the request of an ignorant, dishonest
> misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monKKKey Clone.

Interesting use of the word monkey.  No doubt with the worst racist
connotation, coming from the internet's worst racist, Bill Palmjob.

>
> Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monKKKey Hausmann,

There you go again, racist Nazi Palmjob.  Smearing the net with your racist
shit-stains.

> Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
> game:
>
> >     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians";
> >     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the
> >     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
> >      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
>
> I said it.  I stand by it one-hundred percent, even
> though I remind readers you have snipped out plenty
> of helpful context, Lousy.   You STILL sound suspicially
> like "crude entity" Louse-monKKKey

Palmjob's parade of racial epithets NEVER ENDS!

> Hausmann, as a matter
> of fact, right down to your playing the same "snip and
> distort" game Hausmann favors!  Now, swear on your
> grandmother's false teeth again that you are not the
> Louse-monKKKey you grunt exactly liKKKe...
> >
> >Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
> > his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
>
> Lying again, eh Lousy?  The context you snipped made it
> clear my point was that I don't feel obligated to "post
> proof" about every reasonable suspician I have about
> dishonest losers such as you and your Louse-monKKKey clone.

The only proof you've ever posted in your life, Palmjob, is that you're
race-baiting, race-hating Kluxxer.


    Epithets and slurs galore
    Straight from Palmjob's filthy mind
    Racist, nazi to the core
    Always with a rubber spine

>
> copyright SHEEP FUCKER GIANT
>
>                On Wordscreens of the World
>
>

Go away, Palmjob....

Stu Copeland

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading

In <6hmd9e$r22@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
lousemonkey1@parasite.wilhelp.com (Louse-monkey John
Hausmann" Goin' Nova) grunts: 
>
>In article <6hhfdo$3qm@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>,
wilhelp@ix.netcom.com
>() wrote:
>
>> In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
>> <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts: 
>> >
>> >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
>> >> named "Dave T" can sink no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
>> >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
>> >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
>> >> his miserable existence. 

-------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >Proof please.

      The Louse-monkey on the roof
      Grunts "Post proof, post proof,"
      And long echoes those two words
      Among the birdie turds...

      Some man below yells,
      "Proof of what?  
      Can it be 
      That you're a butt?"

    --Ambrose Bierce  "Unexpurgated Lines"

----------------------------------------------------
 
>> I doubt very seriously that the loser Dave T. will deny 
>> all he email.  He knows better.  And I am certainly not  
>> going to post anything at the request of an ignorant,  
>> dishonest misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey clone
>> who goes by the name "Mike MacLennan".
>> 
>> Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann, 
>> Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
>> game:
>
>Please advise me how to distort the <snicker> "word"
>"suspicially" out of context, oh master <guffaw> of the usenet
>faux pas.

Of course the meaning of a word can be distorted
out of context, Hausmann.  It is just as simple as 
your "Palmer said 'coolie' so Palmer is a racist who
hates Asian people."  Your ugly libel campaign
began with your distorting THAT word out of the
context of a fifteen article lampoon series,
Louse-monkey libelist, so don't pretend you don't
know all about "distorting words out of context".
  
As to your "suspicially" quibble, my complete context 
makes it clear I was referring to the SUSPICIOUS fact 
that though you and entity "Mike 'Lousy' MacLennan" have 
done everything but post video clips of two different 
people swearing on their grandmother's false teeth
that they are not the Louse-monkey, you both STILL 
come off as the same crude, dishonest, talentless, 
libelous, vindictive Louse-monkey we all know and 
despise.

Though the meaning of my sentence you quoted is of course 
crystal clear in the article context, it IS always hilarious 
when a semilitereate grunter like Louse-monkey fancies he 
has some criticism to make about MY writing.  Think about it.  
Hausmann embodies a misfit whose only accomplishment seems 
to be developing a "prose style" that somehow approximates 
the grunts of an unusually ugly warthog.  In fact, Louse-
monkey has yet--using his favorite expression--to "post
proof" that he has masted the simple paragraph form, yet 
now HE'S grunting about MY "faux pas"! Can it be that this 
Louse-monkey warthog from the bowels of the net sewer now 
fancies himself a critic?!!!  
>
>-- 
>Nope, Louse-monkey, it is just as I've been saying all along.  
>You're a malign bastard. 

I said it.  I proudly stand by it one-hundred percent
as a factual depiction of the Louse-monkey's shabby
existence.

World Famous Usenet writer, "my name is wilhelp"

       My name is wilhelp
       And wilhelp is me.
       Louse-monkey gargles
       In a bucket of pee.

wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) proudly demonstrating 
his skills for getting the folks howling with laughter in
<6cr8bc$9vs@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>

Keep clicking on the ONLY authentic wilhelp, folks!
Accept no shabby imitations.


copyright FLAME GIANT

            On Wordscreens of the World

In article <6hmkjq$re9@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com>, wilhelp@ix.netcom.com
() wrote:

> In <6hmd9e$r22@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
> lousemonkey1@parasite.wilhelp.com (Louse-monkey John
> Hausmann" Goin' Nova) grunts: 
> >
> >In article <6hhfdo$3qm@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>,
> wilhelp@ix.netcom.com
> >() wrote:
> >
> >> In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
> >> <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts: 
> >> >
> >> >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
> >> >> named "Dave T" can sink no lower, he surprises me.  Lately, I
> >> >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
> >> >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
> >> >> his miserable existence. 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >Proof please.
> 
>       The Louse-monkey on the roof
>       Grunts "Post proof, post proof,"
>       And long echoes those two words
>       Among the birdie turds...
> 
>       Some man below yells,
>       "Proof of what?  
>       Can it be 
>       That you're a butt?"
> 
>     --Ambrose Bierce  "Unexpurgated Lines"
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------
>  
> >> I doubt very seriously that the loser Dave T. will deny 
> >> all he email.  He knows better.  And I am certainly not  
> >> going to post anything at the request of an ignorant,  
> >> dishonest misfit such as the Lousy MacLouse-monkey clone
> >> who goes by the name "Mike MacLennan".
> >> 
> >> Oh, yes.  And, suspicially like the Louse-monkey Hausmann, 
> >> Lousy plays his usual "distort their words out of context"
> >> game:
> >
> >Please advise me how to distort the <snicker> "word"
> >"suspicially" out of context, oh master <guffaw> of the usenet
> >faux pas.
> 
> Of course the meaning of a word can be distorted
> out of context, Hausmann.  It is just as simple as 
> your "Palmer said 'coolie' so Palmer is a racist who
> hates Asian people."  Your ugly libel campaign
> began with your distorting THAT word out of the
> context of a fifteen article lampoon series,
> Louse-monkey libelist, so don't pretend you don't
> know all about "distorting words out of context".
>   

Hmm. I suppose you can provide a pointer to me
saying exactly what you've said I said. Or will you
now admit to lying?


> As to your "suspicially" quibble, my complete context 
> makes it clear I was referring to the SUSPICIOUS fact 
> that though you and entity "Mike 'Lousy' MacLennan" have 
> done everything but post video clips of two different 
> people swearing on their grandmother's false teeth
> that they are not the Louse-monkey, you both STILL 
> come off as the same crude, dishonest, talentless, 
> libelous, vindictive Louse-monkey we all know and 
> despise.

The latest in Palmjobbery, invent words instead of admitting
a fuck-up. Why, you're a positive froojab! Snargle the frizjit and
cajink along the imbibational low-way.

<snicker>

> 
> Though the meaning of my sentence you quoted is of course 
> crystal clear in the article context, it IS always hilarious 
> when a semilitereate grunter like Louse-monkey fancies he 
> has some criticism to make about MY writing.  Think about it.  
> Hausmann embodies a misfit whose only accomplishment seems 
> to be developing a "prose style" that somehow approximates 
> the grunts of an unusually ugly warthog.  In fact, Louse-
> monkey has yet--using his favorite expression--to "post
> proof" that he has masted the simple paragraph form, yet 
> now HE'S grunting about MY "faux pas"! Can it be that this 
> Louse-monkey warthog from the bowels of the net sewer now 
> fancies himself a critic?!!!  

Sounds "suspicially" like a bad playwrite after getting nothing
but bombs (reviews) on opening night. <snicker>

> >
> >-- 
> >Nope, Louse-monkey, it is just as I've been saying all along.  
> >You're a malign bastard. 
> 
> I said it.  I proudly stand by it one-hundred percent
> as a factual depiction of the Louse-monkey's shabby
> existence.

<snicker>

> 
> World Famous Usenet writer, "my name is wilhelp"
> 
>        My name is wilhelp
>        And wilhelp is me.
>        Louse-monkey gargles
>        In a bucket of pee.
> 
> wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) proudly demonstrating 
> his skills for getting the folks howling with laughter in
> <6cr8bc$9vs@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>

Of course, Biil, having been beaten senseless, is unable
to realize that the howls of laughter are "at him", not
"with him".

-- 
Nope, Louse-monkey, it is just as I've been saying all along.  
You're a malign bastard. 

World Famous Usenet "writer", "my name is wilhelp"
wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) demonstrating 
his "skills" in <6cr8bc$9vs@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>

Goin' Nova wrote:

[Biil, you suck.  Deal.]


> Of course, Biil, having been beaten senseless, is unable
> to realize that the howls of laughter are "at him", not
> "with him".


Hell, you know it's bad when a certain person who posted a poem which
went along the lines of "I am sane.  You are not." mails me to state
that Palmjob's a doofus.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-M i k e  M a c L e n n a n -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

mmaclenn/atthingy/ix.netcom.com           defame/atthingy/wilhelp.com

      Want fame?  Say something stupid to reserve your space below.

     Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; 
     THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the 
     "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
      they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
  
Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
 his arguments in <65acb7$drn@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>

Goin' Nova wrote:
> 
> In article <6hhfdo$3qm@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>, wilhelp@ix.netcom.com
> () wrote:
> 
> > In <353C375B.6873@wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> Mike "Lousy" MacLennan
> > <defame@parasite.wilhelp.remove.to.mail.com> grunts:
> > >
> > >wilhelp@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Just when I begin to think a spineless loser like the phony-
> > >> named "Dave T" can go no lower, he surprises me. 


I surprise even my parents with my rapier wit, Bill. And they are at 
least three steps up the food chain from you.


> > >> Lately, I
> > >> have noticed that this gutless wonder has desperately turned to
> > >> e-mail flaming in the hope that I will continue to recognize
> > >> his miserable existence.


Your recognition is neither solicited nor cared for. The mere fact that 
you are allowed to exist is proof positive that the Supreme Being has a 
sense of humor and allows us minions to share in it.


[snip idiocy]



DaveT

In article <6hmkjq$re9@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com>, wilhelp@ix.netcom.com
() wrote:
>       The Louse-monkey on the roof
>       Grunts "Post proof, post proof,"
>       And long echoes those two words
>       Among the birdie turds...
> 
>       Some man below yells,
>       "Proof of what?  
>       Can it be 
>       That you're a butt?"
> 
>     --Ambrose Bierce  "Unexpurgated Lines"


Speaking of Ambrose...

BORE, n. A person who talks to you when you wish him to listen.

-- 
Kevin Podsiadlik (AKA KJP)