🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: wchar_t values
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 11 Apr 1991 09:38

Re: wchar_t values
By: Masataka Ohta on Thu, 11 Apr 1991 07:14

looking for Obfuscated C Contest rules
By: Christian Carey on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 20:06

Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
By: Chris Torek on Thu, 11 Apr 1991 04:25

Re: Character sets (was Re: wchar_t values)
By: harkcom on Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:29

Re: wchar_t values
By: harkcom on Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:15

Re: wchar_t values
By: Erik M. van der Poel on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 23:49

Re: div() & ldiv() behavior?
By: D'Arcy J.M. Cain on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 18:19

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Jonathan Gingerich on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 19:18

Re: div() & ldiv() behavior?
By: Henry Spencer on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 16:33

Re: wchar_t values
By: Masataka Ohta on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 12:11

div() & ldiv() behavior?
By: Steve Emmerson on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 13:39

universality of Latin-1
By: Erik M. van der Poel on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 11:14

Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 04:47

Re: translation limits
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 04:45

Re: Character sets (was Re: wchar_t values)
By: Erik M. van der Poel on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 08:07

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Blair P. Houghton on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 08:03

Re: wchar_t values
By: Erik M. van der Poel on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 05:23

Re: Character sets (was Re: wchar_t values)
By: Dave Decot on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 01:25

Re: translation limits
By: Scott David Daniels on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 02:04

Re: translation limits
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 10 Apr 1991 00:40

Re: wchar_t values
By: John Gilmore on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 23:43

Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
By: John Gilmore on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 23:09

translation limits
By: Daniel Edelson on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 21:59

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 09 Apr 1991 00:31

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Jonathan Gingerich on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 19:10

Re: wchar_t values
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 01:23

Re: wchar_t values
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 01:16

Re: wchar_t values
By: Doug Gwyn on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 01:16

Re: ISO 646 alternate representation
By: Doug Gwyn on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 00:59

Re: volatile and typedef
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 01:51

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Christopher R Volpe on Mon, 08 Apr 1991 12:34

Re: ISO 646 alternate representation
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Sun, 07 Apr 1991 12:31

Re: wchar_t values
By: Stephen Clamage on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 18:19

Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 04:52

Re: ISO 646 alternate representation
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 04:49

Re: #if query
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 04:50

Re: wchar_t values
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 04:47

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Blair P. Houghton on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 01:53

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Paul Eggert on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 02:22

Re: #if query
By: Chris Torek on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 00:35

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Jay Maynard on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 01:49

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 00:16

Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
By: Chris Torek on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 00:29

#if query
By: cepek on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 22:19

Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
By: John Gilmore on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 21:47

ISO 646 alternate representation
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 17:22

Re: wchar_t values
By: Peter da Silva on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 19:23

Re: wchar_t values
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 17:03

Re: wchar_t values
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 16:23

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Christopher R Volpe on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 19:44

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Jonathan Gingerich on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 18:29

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Christopher R Volpe on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 14:03

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Paul D. Smith on Wed, 03 Apr 1991 04:39

Re: wchar_t values
By: harkcom on Fri, 05 Apr 1991 00:11

Re: wchar_t values
By: Randall Atkinson on Thu, 04 Apr 1991 17:16

Character sets (was Re: wchar_t values)
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 04 Apr 1991 06:31

Re: linkage specifiers
By: Norman Diamond on Thu, 04 Apr 1991 04:20

volatile and typedef
By: Ed Taft on Sat, 06 Apr 1991 21:33

Re: wchar_t values
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Wed, 03 Apr 1991 22:59

Re: Definition of "conforming"
By: John F Carr on Thu, 04 Apr 1991 01:16

linkage specifiers
By: daniel on Wed, 03 Apr 1991 22:19

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Karl Heuer on Wed, 03 Apr 1991 04:16

Re: Definition of "conforming"
By: Doug Gwyn on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 23:41

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Doug Gwyn on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 22:24

ISO vs. AnsiC stds. Info on differences
By: Vijay Tatkar on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 22:04

Definition of "conforming"
By: Christopher R Volpe on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 20:22

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Geoffrey Rogers on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 14:03

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Christopher R Volpe on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 13:24

Re: function declarators
By: Norman Diamond on Tue, 02 Apr 1991 05:13

function declarators
By: Daniel Edelson on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 23:36

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Roy Johnson on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 20:21

Re: wchar_t values
By: Doug Gwyn on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 13:54

Re: wchar_t values
By: Doug Gwyn on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 06:45

Re: wchar_t values
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 06:52

Re: wchar_t values
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 01 Apr 1991 06:49

Re: wchar_t values
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 16:22

Re: wchar_t values
By: Erik M. van der Poel on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 04:55

Re: wchar_t values
By: Doug Gwyn on Sun, 31 Mar 1991 00:34

Re: wchar_t values
By: Keld J|rn Simonsen on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 19:20

Re: Is this a bug in Quick C?
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 14:48

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 14:37

Re: wchar_t values
By: Doug Gwyn on Sat, 30 Mar 1991 14:39

Re: Is this a bug in Quick C?
By: Lars Henrik Mathiesen on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 22:05

Re: tmpfile Question
By: Rob McMahon on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 16:40

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Jonathan Gingerich on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 17:43

Re: wchar_t values
By: Michael Meissner on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 17:00

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 07:18

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Christopher R Volpe on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 13:23

Re: Definition With Incomplete Type Should Be An Error
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 07:07

Re: More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Christopher R Volpe on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 13:19

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Blair P. Houghton on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 06:41

Re: wchar_t values
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 07:39

More Re: Function Argument Evaluation argument
By: Blair P. Houghton on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 06:13

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 07:31

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Norman Diamond on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 06:51

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Ed Gould on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 19:46

wchar_t values
By: Erik M. van der Poel on Fri, 29 Mar 1991 01:00

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Doug Gwyn on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 22:55

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Mark Brown on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 22:40

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Chris Mills x2427 dept203 on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 19:19

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Chris Torek on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 10:59

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Jonathan Gingerich on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 18:05

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Chris Torek on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 18:13

Re: Unary plus
By: Blair P. Houghton on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 06:48

Re: tmpfile Question
By: Blair P. Houghton on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 06:29

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Blair P. Houghton on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 06:16

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Christopher R Volpe on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 14:57

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Christopher R Volpe on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 14:36

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Jim Patterson on Tue, 26 Mar 1991 16:04

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Karl Heuer on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 02:29

Re: Definition With Incomplete Type Should Be An Error
By: Karl Heuer on Thu, 28 Mar 1991 01:42

Re: tmpfile Question
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 21:54

Re: tmpfile Question
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 22:20

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 22:18

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 22:15

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 22:04

Re: Unary plus
By: Doug Gwyn on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 21:57

Definition With Incomplete Type Should Be An Error
By: Bruce Blodgett on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 21:49

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Guido van Rossum on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 09:18

c
By: Edward Chien on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 19:40

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Karl Heuer on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 19:48

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Jonathan Gingerich on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 18:11

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Christopher R Volpe on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 13:24

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Christopher R Volpe on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 13:10

Re: Function Argument Evaluation
By: Chris Torek on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 10:44

Re: The Preprocessor and tokens
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 03:35

Re: proper semi-portable use of signal()?
By: Norman Diamond on Wed, 27 Mar 1991 01:40