Thread View: fido.shortwave
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by news.vif.com
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:07
UPS
Author: news.vif.com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:07
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:07
6 lines
1921 bytes
1921 bytes
Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any insurance on the package. Fucken idiots! --
Re: UPS
Author: Jim Hackett
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:41
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:41
21 lines
2054 bytes
2054 bytes
I don't think that's what he's saying. If I'm right, he's lucky he got $100... I have been know to be wrong... "Diamond Dave" <sjester911@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com... > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:07:11 -0400, "news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> > wrote: > > >Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux > >for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any > >insurance on the package. > > Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you insured the > package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they will > only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened?
Re: UPS
Author: Jeff
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:30
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:30
25 lines
2267 bytes
2267 bytes
"Diamond Dave" <sjester911@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:07:11 -0400, "news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux
> >for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any
> >insurance on the package.
>
> Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you insured the
> package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they will
> only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but did
not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because
that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship
UPS. "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the
bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's
ins. rates are very reasonable. 2 guilty parties here.
J
Re: UPS
Author: news.vif.com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:57
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:57
40 lines
3729 bytes
3729 bytes
Diamond Dave wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:30:20 GMT, "Jeff" <oldog@(nospam)mchsi.com> wrote: > >>"Diamond Dave" <sjester911@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com... >> >>>On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:07:11 -0400, "news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux >>>>for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any >>>>insurance on the package. >>> >>>Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you insured the >>>package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they will >>>only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened? >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but did >>not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because >>that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship >>UPS. "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the >>bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's >>ins. rates are very reasonable. 2 guilty parties here. No. Insurance, giving different story their wasn't Bottom of the story i lost out $800 buxs. > > > This is what I suspect also, but I wanted it claified with details from the OP. > If this is the case, the OP caused his own loss by not insuring the package, > the contract with UPS is plainly stated on many of their forms, their web site > and in their store locations. Yeah, UPS screwed up by losing the pkg but > the OP harmed himself by not insuring the pkg. Who fuck side are you on, seems your taking sides (UPS) --
Re: UPS
Author: Jeff
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55
37 lines
3040 bytes
3040 bytes
"news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> wrote in message news:1129589847.678620@www.vif.com...
> >>>
> >>>>Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux
> >>>>for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any
> >>>>insurance on the package.
> >>>
> >>>Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you insured the
> >>>package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they will
> >>>only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened?
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but did
> >>not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because
> >>that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship
> >>UPS. "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the
> >>bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's
> >>ins. rates are very reasonable. 2 guilty parties here.
> No. Insurance, giving different story their wasn't
> Bottom of the story i lost out $800 buxs.
> >
> >
> > This is what I suspect also, but I wanted it claified with details from the OP.
> > If this is the case, the OP caused his own loss by not insuring the package,
> > the contract with UPS is plainly stated on many of their forms, their web site
> > and in their store locations. Yeah, UPS screwed up by losing the pkg but
> > the OP harmed himself by not insuring the pkg.
>
> Who fuck side are you on, seems your taking sides (UPS)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither,,,,, just an opinion as to what happened.
J
Re: UPS
Author: Ken Taylor
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:03
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:03
53 lines
3346 bytes
3346 bytes
"news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> wrote in message news:1129589847.678620@www.vif.com... > > > Diamond Dave wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:30:20 GMT, "Jeff" <oldog@(nospam)mchsi.com> wrote: >> >>>"Diamond Dave" <sjester911@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>news:m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com... >>> >>>>On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:07:11 -0400, "news.vif.com" >>>><root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux >>>>>for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any >>>>>insurance on the package. >>>> >>>>Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you >>>>insured the >>>>package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they >>>>will >>>>only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened? >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but >>> did >>>not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because >>>that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship >>>UPS. "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the >>>bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's >>>ins. rates are very reasonable. 2 guilty parties here. > No. Insurance, giving different story their wasn't > Bottom of the story i lost out $800 buxs. >> >> >> This is what I suspect also, but I wanted it claified with details from >> the OP. >> If this is the case, the OP caused his own loss by not insuring the >> package, >> the contract with UPS is plainly stated on many of their forms, their web >> site >> and in their store locations. Yeah, UPS screwed up by losing the pkg but >> the OP harmed himself by not insuring the pkg. > > Who fuck side are you on, seems your taking sides (UPS) > -- You gambled by not insuring and you lost. No sides involved. Ken
Re: UPS
Author: Has
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:38
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:38
16 lines
2024 bytes
2024 bytes
"news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> wrote in message news:1129565231.833625@www.vif.com... > Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux > for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any > insurance on the package. > > Fucken idiots! > -- If they lost the package, how are they supposed to know what was in it? Next time, tell 'em it was worth ten grand for all the good it will do... Sorry to hear of such an expensive lesson, but perhaps it will help the next guy--spring for the insurance. -has
Re: UPS
Author: Paul Keenleyside
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:11
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:11
114 lines
6524 bytes
6524 bytes
"Jeff" <oldog@(nospam)mchsi.com> wrote in message news:VRW4f.254546$084.141027@attbi_s22... > > "news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> wrote in message > news:1129589847.678620@www.vif.com... > >> >>> >> >>>>Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux >> >>>>for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any >> >>>>insurance on the package. >> >>> >> >>>Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you >> >>>insured the >> >>>package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and >> >>>they will >> >>>only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened? >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but >> >> did >> >>not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because >> >>that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship >> >>UPS. "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the >> >>bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's >> >>ins. rates are very reasonable. 2 guilty parties here. >> No. Insurance, giving different story their wasn't >> Bottom of the story i lost out $800 buxs. >> > >> > >> > This is what I suspect also, but I wanted it claified with details from >> > the OP. >> > If this is the case, the OP caused his own loss by not insuring the >> > package, >> > the contract with UPS is plainly stated on many of their forms, their >> > web site >> > and in their store locations. Yeah, UPS screwed up by losing the pkg >> > but >> > the OP harmed himself by not insuring the pkg. >> >> Who fuck side are you on, seems your taking sides (UPS) Actually Both sides are wrong. Friend is far more wrong than UPS is. First, our friend: He erred in not insuring the package. Insurance for the transportation of packages is very rarely declined, it's offered as an extra cost item to protect expensive packages. He signed a contract (Contract of Carriage) which states that the carrier (UPS) will be limited to about $100.00 or what the limitation is set to. More requires insurance. Simple fact of life in transportation. All courier companies (even FedEx) have the same rule. The same thing holds true with airlines. If you're carrying $2500 worth of stuff in your luggage that can't be replaced, buy insurance because the airlines will only provide you up to a certain amount, and it certainly won't be $2500.00. He also erred in not keeping track of the package as it was moving through the UPS system. Quite easy to do in this day and age of the Internet. For a $900.00 item I would be sharp eyed, and check on it from time to time as it moves through the system. If it had stopped for a long time and hasn't reached him, then I would backtrack. One hopes he kept a copy of all documentation, he can probably still backtrack to find the last known location of it, but he won't get $900.00 for his compensation. No way. Second, UPS: They erred in simply loosing the packages, but when you're handling gazillions of packages every day there's bound to be at least a few of those lost. Perhaps the ingnoramous who was checking in the package for delivery didn't fill out the stickers properly and perhaps didn't make sure they were stuck on solidly. UPS probably offers insurance as an add on cost, but they are not legally bound to do so. It's more of making money off the commission of the insurance offer, but the buyer gets a bit of a piece of mind. Then there's: Did he clearly seal the package and set the documentation right? I always write the Bill of Lading (Waybill) Number clearly on the front of the package in black in big letters and numbers so that the doltsthat handle it can see it. Did the stickers stick on the package right? If you lose those, then it causes problems. Those little stickers have your package number on them. I've seen packages split open like an autopsy patient simply because the shipper didn't seal the package properly. I've had packages misdirected,but was quickly able to find out where it ended up and had the carrier redirect it on their own dime. Also kept close tabs on the progress of other shipments as well. Like that $5 million worth of lumber I sent to Elkhart Indiana a few years ago by railroad and truck. Painful lesson, but lesson to be learned here for others. be very specific and precise when shipping, esp. when dealing with someone through eBay. Transportation has evolved so much for the shipper it's very easy to keep an eye on shipments from the moment they leave the house or store. Worked in claims and work in logistics for a transportation company, so I know my way around a cargo trailer and sorting room. And no contrary to popular belief, the courier company sort guys do not use your package as a football playing as if they were making a long bomb in the fourth quarter of a 14-18 spread imaginary football game at noon hour...
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads