🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

🏠 Home 📰 News 🗂️ Usenet Search 🔑 Login 📝 Register
Thread View: sci.logic
30 messages
[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles
30 total messages Started by Graham Cooper Wed, 08 Aug 2012 22:05
WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#959
Author: Graham Cooper
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 22:05
53 lines
2031 bytes 
MARTIN MUSATOV'S AMAZING PROPHECY!

https://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/msg/c10a64f5a3c70b29

  +-----+
  |+---+|
  ||   ||
  ||   ||
  ||   ||
  |+---+|
  +-----+

    [+]

     +
    / \
  +-----+
  |     |
 /|     |\
+ |     | +
 \|     |/
  |     |
  +-----+
    \ /
     +

    [=]

     +
    / \
  +-----+
  |+---+|
 /||   ||\
+ ||   || +
 \||   ||/
  |+---+|
  +-----+
    \ /
     +


 12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
 with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
stars.



8 / 8 / 12
http://www.microprolog.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg

BEHOLD THE 12 POINTED STAR!

Herc
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#960
Author: BDK
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:01
62 lines
2756 bytes 
In article <b51ca0e2-4f9c-4767-a9dc-64d04656a505
@iw9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcooper7@gmail.com says...
> 
> MARTIN MUSATOV'S AMAZING PROPHECY!
> 
> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/msg/c10a64f5a3c70b29
> 
>   +-----+
>   |+---+|
>   ||   ||
>   ||   ||
>   ||   ||
>   |+---+|
>   +-----+
> 
>     [+]
> 
>      +
>     / \
>   +-----+
>   |     |
>  /|     |\
> + |     | +
>  \|     |/
>   |     |
>   +-----+
>     \ /
>      +
> 
>     [=]
> 
>      +
>     / \
>   +-----+
>   |+---+|
>  /||   ||\
> + ||   || +
>  \||   ||/
>   |+---+|
>   +-----+
>     \ /
>      +
> 
> 
>  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
>  with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> stars.
> 
> 
> 
> 8 / 8 / 12
> http://www.microprolog.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
> 
> BEHOLD THE 12 POINTED STAR!
> 
> Herc

What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family have 
you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?

-- 
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#961
Author: Graham Cooper
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:20
12 lines
2120 bytes 
> >  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky


> > 8 / 8 / 12
> >http://www.microprolog.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg


Can you see a GREAT SIGN APPEAR IN THE SKY.

If I post about a PHOTO, the topic is THAT PHOTO!

If you don't like HYPERLINKS, don't trash the THREAD.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#962
Author: Martin Michael Musatov
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:58
54 lines
2827 bytes 
On Aug 8, 5:05 pm, Graham Cooper <microscope..@mailbomb> wrote:
> MARTIN MUSATOV'S AMAZING PROPHECY!
>
> Httpd://groundskeeper/group/sociologist/MSG/c10a64f5a3c70b29
>
>   +-----+
>   |+---+|
>   ||   ||
>   ||   ||
>   ||   ||
>   |+---+|
>   +-----+
>
>     [+]
>
>      +
>     / \
>   +-----+
>   |     |
>  /|     |\
> + |     | +
>  \|     |/
>   |     |
>   +-----+
>     \ /
>      +
>
>     [=]
>
>      +
>     / \
>   +-----+
>   |+---+|
>  /||   ||\
> + ||   || +
>  \||   ||/
>   |+---+|
>   +-----+
>     \ /
>      +
>
>  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
>  with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> stars.
>
> 8 / 8 / HTTP://simplification/Low Moon-Sun-12Stars. jog
>
> BEHOLD THE 12 POINTED STAR!
>
> Heckler
The correct answer to your question is when 8=6 and 6=8 or when 12=16
or 16=2. Signed Musatov, aka the red-eyed artist! The read words are
always around the ones where his name appears: Musatov! Musatov!
Musatov! How does he do it?
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#952
Author: Martin Michael Musatov
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:50
74 lines
3205 bytes 
And now the Artist only writes you not to trash the thread but to
dismiss you as envious of the features of the highness of heaven the
proper reply shall be given Graham Cooper after On Aug 8, 6:01 pm,
BDRM <Cont...@Counterblast> wrote:
> In article <b51ca0e2-4f9c-4767-a9dc-64d04656a505
> @iw9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, microscope...@mailbomb says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > MARTIN MUSATOV'S AMAZING PROPHECY!
>
> >HTTP://groundskeeper/group/scatological/ms g/c10a64f5a3c70b29
>
> >   +-----+
> >   |+---+|
> >   ||   ||
> >   ||   ||
> >   ||   ||
> >   |+---+|
> >   +-----+
>
> >     [+]
>
> >      +
> >     / \
> >   +-----+
> >   |     |
> >  /|     |\
> > + |     | +
> >  \|     |/
> >   |     |
> >   +-----+
> >     \ /
> >      +
>
> >     [=]
>
> >      +
> >     / \
> >   +-----+
> >   |+---+|
> >  /||   ||\
> > + ||   || +
> >  \||   ||/
> >   |+---+|
> >   +-----+
> >     \ /
> >      +
>
> >  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
> >  with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> > stars.
>
> > 8 / 8 / 12
> >Http://simplification/Low Moon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
>
> > BEHOLD THE 12 POINTED STAR!
>
> > Hera
>
> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family have
> you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
>
> --
> BK- Head FUD-Master Blaster.
Officiousness
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#963
Author: Martin Michael Musatov
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:51
11 lines
2362 bytes 
On Aug 8, 6:20 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky
> > > 8 / 8 / 12
> > >http://www.microprolog.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
>
> Can you see a GREAT SIGN APPEAR IN THE SKY.
>
> If I post about a PHOTO, the topic is THAT PHOTO!
>
> If you don't like HYPERLINKS, don't trash the THREAD.
Mr. Cooper I love it. Well done. Artist.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#953
Author: Martin Michael Musatov
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:52
16 lines
2247 bytes 
On Aug 8, 8:51 pm, Martin Michael Musatov
<musatovatattdot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 6:20 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:> > >  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky
> > > > 8 / 8 / 12
> > > >http://www.microprolog.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
>
> > Can you see a GREAT SIGN APPEAR IN THE SKY.
Yes I saw it.
> > If I post about a PHOTO, the topic is THAT PHOTO!
>
> > If you don't like HYPERLINKS, don't trash the THREAD.
>
> Mr. Cooper I love it. Well done. Artist.
After I wrote the line above. Sincerely, Musatov. With you always,
Artist.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#954
Author: Mike Painter
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:11
10 lines
2201 bytes 
On 8/8/2012 4:01 PM, BDK wrote:
<snip>

>
> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family have
> you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
>

Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only posts when 
he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level wher he cann communicate.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#955
Author: BDK
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:58
19 lines
2487 bytes 
In article <n9WdnRcJhocfpb7NnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@giganews.com>, 
md.painter@sbcglobal.net says...
> 
> On 8/8/2012 4:01 PM, BDK wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> >
> > What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family have
> > you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
> >
> 
> Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only posts when 
> he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level wher he cann communicate.

MAybe so, I hope not, as that would make his normal level as maximum 
batshit crazy and not just batshit crazy.

-- 
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#956
Author: HVAC
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:16
28 lines
2307 bytes 
On 8/9/2012 11:58 AM, BDK wrote:
>
>>>
>>> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family have
>>> you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
>>>
>>
>> Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only posts when
>> he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level wher he cann communicate.
>
> MAybe so, I hope not, as that would make his normal level as maximum
> batshit crazy and not just batshit crazy.


I believe the technical term for that is 'shithouse rat crazy'.

Kind of like Goth.








-- 
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#957
Author: BDK
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:02
25 lines
2701 bytes 
In article <k00nor$8t6$1@hvac.motzarella.org>, mr.hvac@gmail.com says...
> 
> On 8/9/2012 11:58 AM, BDK wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family have
> >>> you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only posts when
> >> he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level wher he cann communicate.
> >
> > MAybe so, I hope not, as that would make his normal level as maximum
> > batshit crazy and not just batshit crazy.
> 
> 
> I believe the technical term for that is 'shithouse rat crazy'.
> 
> Kind of like Goth.

Sometimes I wonder if the UbdrkOOks have theme music that plays in their 
heads?

-- 
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#958
Author: MarkA
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:11
8 lines
1411 bytes 
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:05:26 -0700, Graham Cooper wrote:

When you are counting in base 14.  Duh.

-- 
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#948
Author: H�gar
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:42
7 lines
2060 bytes 
"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:k00nor$8t6$1@hvac.motzarella.org...
> On 8/9/2012 11:58 AM, BDK wrote:


Only when BertBrain does the math ...
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#949
Author: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 03:11
6 lines
1893 bytes 
Base 14.

-- 
Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Life is like an analogy.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#950
Author: Fidem Turbare, the non-existent ...
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:36
75 lines
3503 bytes 
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:01:45 -0400
BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> In article <b51ca0e2-4f9c-4767-a9dc-64d04656a505
> @iw9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcooper7@gmail.com says...
> > 
> > MARTIN MUSATOV'S AMAZING PROPHECY!
> > 
> > https://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/msg/c10a64f5a3c70b29
> > 
> >   +-----+
> >   |+---+|
> >   ||   ||
> >   ||   ||
> >   ||   ||
> >   |+---+|
> >   +-----+
> > 
> >     [+]
> > 
> >      +
> >     / \
> >   +-----+
> >   |     |
> >  /|     |\
> > + |     | +
> >  \|     |/
> >   |     |
> >   +-----+
> >     \ /
> >      +
> > 
> >     [=]
> > 
> >      +
> >     / \
> >   +-----+
> >   |+---+|
> >  /||   ||\
> > + ||   || +
> >  \||   ||/
> >   |+---+|
> >   +-----+
> >     \ /
> >      +
> > 
> > 
> >  12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the
> > sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> > stars.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 8 / 8 / 12
> > http://www.microprolog.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
> > 
> > BEHOLD THE 12 POINTED STAR!
> > 
> > Herc

I do like that ASCII art.  Thanks!

> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your family
> have you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?

I suspect that some mental hospitals may be permitting Usenet access
for some of their patients as an initial stepping stone on the long road
to re-integrating into soceity.  (And it probably also keeps the
patients busy for a while so the orderlies can get a break.)

-- 
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking.
There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked
solutions.  Nothing pains some people more than having to think."
   -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#951
Author: Fidem Turbare, the non-existent ...
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:37
26 lines
2503 bytes 
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:16:30 -0400
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/9/2012 11:58 AM, BDK wrote:
> 
>>>> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your
>>>> family have you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
>>> 
>>> Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only posts
>>> when he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level wher he
>>> cann communicate.
>> 
>> MAybe so, I hope not, as that would make his normal level as maximum
>> batshit crazy and not just batshit crazy.
> 
> I believe the technical term for that is 'shithouse rat crazy'.
> 
> Kind of like Goth.

Do you really think Goth kids will comply?  Ha ha!  Good luck with that,
for they all refuse to comply with anything.

-- 
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"The strengthening of our statehood is, at times, deliberately
interpreted as authoritarianism."
   -- Vladimir Putin
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#946
Author: HVAC
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:43
33 lines
2873 bytes 
On 8/12/2012 3:37 AM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:16:30 -0400
> HVAC<mr.hvac@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 8/9/2012 11:58 AM, BDK wrote:
>>
>>>>> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your
>>>>> family have you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared for?
>>>>
>>>> Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only posts
>>>> when he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level wher he
>>>> cann communicate.
>>>
>>> MAybe so, I hope not, as that would make his normal level as maximum
>>> batshit crazy and not just batshit crazy.
>>
>> I believe the technical term for that is 'shithouse rat crazy'.
>>
>> Kind of like Goth.
>
> Do you really think Goth kids will comply?  Ha ha!  Good luck with that,
> for they all refuse to comply with anything.
>


Sorry, it was a typo...A completely inadvertent error.

It was supposed to be 'Guth'.



-- 
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#947
Author: Fidem Turbare, the non-existent ...
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:07
36 lines
2896 bytes 
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:43:10 -0400
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/12/2012 3:37 AM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:16:30 -0400
>> HVAC<mr.hvac@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On 8/9/2012 11:58 AM, BDK wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> What the fuck are you jabbering about now? Why doesn't your
>>>>>> family have you sent back to the 'bin where you can be cared
>>>>>> for?
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably true but there is also the possibility that he only
>>>>> posts when he in on drugs and they bring him down to a level
>>>>> wher he cann communicate.
>>>>
>>>> MAybe so, I hope not, as that would make his normal level as
>>>> maximum batshit crazy and not just batshit crazy.
>>>
>>> I believe the technical term for that is 'shithouse rat crazy'.
>>>
>>> Kind of like Goth.
>>
>> Do you really think Goth kids will comply?  Ha ha!  Good luck with
>> that, for they all refuse to comply with anything.
> 
> Sorry, it was a typo...A completely inadvertent error.
> 
> It was supposed to be 'Guth'.

Ha ha!  Is there much chance that Guth will comply?

-- 
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Calamity is the test of integrity."
   -- Samuel Richardson
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#945
Author: HVAC
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:15
30 lines
2578 bytes 
On 8/12/2012 12:07 PM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess 
wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> I believe the technical term for that is 'shithouse rat crazy'.
>>>>
>>>> Kind of like Goth.
>>>
>>> Do you really think Goth kids will comply?  Ha ha!  Good luck with
>>> that, for they all refuse to comply with anything.
>>
>> Sorry, it was a typo...A completely inadvertent error.
>>
>> It was supposed to be 'Guth'.
>
> Ha ha!  Is there much chance that Guth will comply?


No. Goth will remain 'shithouse rat crazy'.








-- 
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#939
Author: Krevo
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:57
9 lines
2289 bytes 
12.8.2012 19:07, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess kirjoitti:
>WHEN DOES   [8] + [8] = [12] ?

It is easy calculation, when 14-base number that is true...
9 = 9, A = 10, 12 = for example C, D = 13, E = 14 = 10,15 = 11
and [16](10) = [12](14).

Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering, and 
that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#940
Author: Fidem Turbare, the non-existent ...
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:35
35 lines
3367 bytes 
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
Krevo <aki.karppinen@tut.fi> wrote:
> 12.8.2012 19:07, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
> kirjoitti:
> 
>> WHEN DOES   [8] + [8] = [12] ?
> 
> It is easy calculation, when 14-base number that is true...
> 9 = 9, A = 10, 12 = for example C, D = 13, E = 14 = 10,15 = 11
> and [16](10) = [12](14).

Graham Cooper asked that question, not me.  Please be careful to
attribute correctly in your quoting when replying.

> Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?

No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).

It's also unclear how winning any number of gold medals from the
Olympic Games has any relation to any of this.

-- 
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"The masses find it difficult to understand politics, their
intelligence is small, therefore all effective propaganda must be
limited to a very few points.  The masses will only remember only the
simplest ideas repeated a thousand times over, and if I approach the
masses with reasoned arguments, they will not understand me because in
the mass meeting their reasoning power is paralyzed, and so what I say
is like an order given under hypnosis."
   -- Adolf Hitler (1925)
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#941
Author: Odysseus
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:44
24 lines
3007 bytes 
In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77817@fidemturbare.com>,
 "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess" 
 <goddess@fidemturbare.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> Krevo <aki.karppinen@tut.fi> wrote:

<snip>
 
> > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> > and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
> 
> No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
> 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
> base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
> one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).

It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to be 
digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated numerals are 
written; I understood the first statement to say that "16" in decimal 
refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical -- which is indeed true.

-- 
Odysseus
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#942
Author: Graham Cooper
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:58
100 lines
4713 bytes 
On Aug 19, 9:44 am, Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
> In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77...@fidemturbare.com>,
>  "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
>
>  <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> > Krevo <aki.karppi...@tut.fi> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> > > and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
>
> > No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
> > 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
> > base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
> > one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).
>
> It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to be
> digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated numerals are
> written; I understood the first statement to say that "16" in decimal
> refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical -- which is indeed true.
>
> --
> Odysseus

The correct answer was:  "on 8th of the 8th 2012".

when I took this photo of the 12 pointed star

http://pro1og.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg

However, when trying to work out the nature of the 12 points, I
incorrectly visualised the wrong polygon equation (2 concentric
squares + 1 concentric square and diagonal square) instead of the
actual 2 concentric diagonal squares which only makes  8+4=12.

--------+---------
------+ + +-------
-----+ +-+ +------
----+ +---+ +-----
---+ +-----+ +----
----+ +---+ +-----
-----+ +-+ +------
------+ + +-------
--------+---------

       [+]

------------------
-----********-----
-----*------*-----
-----*------*-----
-----*------*-----
-----*------*-----
-----*------*-----
-----*------*-----
-----********-----
------------------

       [=]

--------+---------
----**+ + +**-----
----*+ +-+ +*-----
----+ +---+ +-----
---+ +-----+ +----
----+ +---+ +-----
----*+ +-+ +*-----
----**+ + +**-----
--------+---------


the morning after Musatov posted this about a 12 star sign in the sky.


7/AUG/12

Martin Musatov.
Woman of the Apocalypse
12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
stars.
2 She was with ...



(yes a nice babe (angel) works in the supermarket there..)

But since you're all tuned into Pen and Teller Bullsh%t it's of little
consequence.

Herc
--
http://microPROLOG.com

[mP]-FACT ADDED
[mP]-[happy Dude] if [rich Dude].
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#943
Author: Graham Cooper
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:47
71 lines
3909 bytes 
> http://pro1og.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
>
> However, when trying to work out the nature of the 12 points, I
> incorrectly visualised the wrong polygon equation (2 concentric
> squares + 1 concentric square and diagonal square) instead of the
> actual 2 concentric diagonal squares which only makes  8+4=12.


Well you CAN get 8 + 8 = 12 this way..


 --------+---------
 ------+ + +-------
 -----+ +-+ +------
 ----+ +---+ +-----
 ---+ +-----+ +----
 ----+ +---+ +-----
 -----+ +-+ +------
 ------+ + +-------
 --------+---------

        [+]

 ---------+--------
 --------+-+-------
 -----*********----
 -----*-------*----
 ----+*-------*+---
 ---+-*-------*-+--
 ----+*-------*+---
 -----*-------*----
 -----*********----
 --------+-+-------
 ---------+--------

        [=]

 --------+---------
 ----**+ + +**-----
 ----*+ +-+ +*-----
 ----+ +---+ +-----
 ---+ +-----+ +----
 ----+ +---+ +-----
 ----*+ +-+ +*-----
 ----**+ + +**-----
 --------+---------


Ah Good, I would hate to have made an erroneous post!

Herc
--

http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-QUESTIONS
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-POWERSET
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-THEOREM
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-FORALL
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-TURING
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-GODEL
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-PROOF
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-MATHS
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-LOGIC
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-BRAIN
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-REAL
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-SETS
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-HALT
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-PERM
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-P-NP
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-GUT
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-BB
http://tinyURL.com/BLUEPRINTS-AI
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#934
Author: BDK
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:27
102 lines
5134 bytes 
In article <856d4a8b-2500-4663-a86d-
794040272a0c@kn3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcooper7@gmail.com 
says...
> 
> On Aug 19, 9:44�am, Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
> > In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77...@fidemturbare.com>,
> > �"Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
> >
> > �<godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> > > Krevo <aki.karppi...@tut.fi> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> > > > and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
> >
> > > No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14. �The number 16D is not equal to
> > > 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
> > > base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
> > > one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).
> >
> > It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to be
> > digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated numerals are
> > written; I understood the first statement to say that "16" in decimal
> > refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical -- which is indeed true.
> >
> > --
> > Odysseus
> 
> The correct answer was:  "on 8th of the 8th 2012".
> 
> when I took this photo of the 12 pointed star
> 
> http://pro1og.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
> 
> However, when trying to work out the nature of the 12 points, I
> incorrectly visualised the wrong polygon equation (2 concentric
> squares + 1 concentric square and diagonal square) instead of the
> actual 2 concentric diagonal squares which only makes  8+4=12.
> 
> --------+---------
> ------+ + +-------
> -----+ +-+ +------
> ----+ +---+ +-----
> ---+ +-----+ +----
> ----+ +---+ +-----
> -----+ +-+ +------
> ------+ + +-------
> --------+---------
> 
>        [+]
> 
> ------------------
> -----********-----
> -----*------*-----
> -----*------*-----
> -----*------*-----
> -----*------*-----
> -----*------*-----
> -----*------*-----
> -----********-----
> ------------------
> 
>        [=]
> 
> --------+---------
> ----**+ + +**-----
> ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> ----+ +---+ +-----
> ---+ +-----+ +----
> ----+ +---+ +-----
> ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> ----**+ + +**-----
> --------+---------
> 
> 
> the morning after Musatov posted this about a 12 star sign in the sky.
> 
> 
> 7/AUG/12
> 
> Martin Musatov.
> Woman of the Apocalypse
> 12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
> with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> stars.
> 2 She was with ...
> 
> 
> 
> (yes a nice babe (angel) works in the supermarket there..)
> 
> But since you're all tuned into Pen and Teller Bullsh%t it's of little
> consequence.
> 
> Herc

What in the hell are you jabbering about?

-- 
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#935
Author: Graham Cooper
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:38
123 lines
5434 bytes 
On Aug 19, 1:27 pm, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> In article <856d4a8b-2500-4663-a86d-
> 794040272...@kn3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcoop...@gmail.com
> says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 19, 9:44 am, Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
> > > In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77...@fidemturbare.com>,
> > >  "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
>
> > >  <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> > > > Krevo <aki.karppi...@tut.fi> wrote:
>
> > > <snip>
>
> > > > > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> > > > > and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
>
> > > > No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
> > > > 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
> > > > base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
> > > > one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).
>
> > > It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to be
> > > digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated numerals are
> > > written; I understood the first statement to say that "16" in decimal
> > > refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical -- which is indeed true.
>
> > > --
> > > Odysseus
>
> > The correct answer was:  "on 8th of the 8th 2012".
>
> > when I took this photo of the 12 pointed star
>
> >http://pro1og.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
>
> > However, when trying to work out the nature of the 12 points, I
> > incorrectly visualised the wrong polygon equation (2 concentric
> > squares + 1 concentric square and diagonal square) instead of the
> > actual 2 concentric diagonal squares which only makes  8+4=12.
>
> > --------+---------
> > ------+ + +-------
> > -----+ +-+ +------
> > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > ---+ +-----+ +----
> > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > -----+ +-+ +------
> > ------+ + +-------
> > --------+---------
>
> >        [+]
>
> > ------------------
> > -----********-----
> > -----*------*-----
> > -----*------*-----
> > -----*------*-----
> > -----*------*-----
> > -----*------*-----
> > -----*------*-----
> > -----********-----
> > ------------------
>
> >        [=]
>
> > --------+---------
> > ----**+ + +**-----
> > ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > ---+ +-----+ +----
> > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> > ----**+ + +**-----
> > --------+---------
>
> > the morning after Musatov posted this about a 12 star sign in the sky.
>
> > 7/AUG/12
>
> > Martin Musatov.
> > Woman of the Apocalypse
> > 12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
> > with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> > stars.
> > 2 She was with ...
>
> > (yes a nice babe (angel) works in the supermarket there..)
>
> > But since you're all tuned into Pen and Teller Bullsh%t it's of little
> > consequence.
>
> > Herc
>
> What in the hell are you jabbering about?

2 8 vertex figures superimposed = a 12 vertex figure.

as seen in the photo I took on 8 August.

You guys bumped the thread!


Herc
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#936
Author: BDK
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:12
124 lines
6233 bytes 
In article <1a0f266f-05da-4856-b55b-
4e39a38ae21c@oz6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcooper7@gmail.com 
says...
> 
> On Aug 19, 1:27�pm, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> > In article <856d4a8b-2500-4663-a86d-
> > 794040272...@kn3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcoop...@gmail.com
> > says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 19, 9:44�am, Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
> > > > In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77...@fidemturbare.com>,
> > > > �"Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
> >
> > > > �<godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> > > > > Krevo <aki.karppi...@tut.fi> wrote:
> >
> > > > <snip>
> >
> > > > > > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> > > > > > and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
> >
> > > > > No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14. �The number 16D is not equal to
> > > > > 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
> > > > > base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
> > > > > one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).
> >
> > > > It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to be
> > > > digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated numerals are
> > > > written; I understood the first statement to say that "16" in decimal
> > > > refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical -- which is indeed true.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Odysseus
> >
> > > The correct answer was: �"on 8th of the 8th 2012".
> >
> > > when I took this photo of the 12 pointed star
> >
> > >http://pro1og.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
> >
> > > However, when trying to work out the nature of the 12 points, I
> > > incorrectly visualised the wrong polygon equation (2 concentric
> > > squares + 1 concentric square and diagonal square) instead of the
> > > actual 2 concentric diagonal squares which only makes �8+4=12.
> >
> > > --------+---------
> > > ------+ + +-------
> > > -----+ +-+ +------
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > ---+ +-----+ +----
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > -----+ +-+ +------
> > > ------+ + +-------
> > > --------+---------
> >
> > > � � � �[+]
> >
> > > ------------------
> > > -----********-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----********-----
> > > ------------------
> >
> > > � � � �[=]
> >
> > > --------+---------
> > > ----**+ + +**-----
> > > ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > ---+ +-----+ +----
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> > > ----**+ + +**-----
> > > --------+---------
> >
> > > the morning after Musatov posted this about a 12 star sign in the sky.
> >
> > > 7/AUG/12
> >
> > > Martin Musatov.
> > > Woman of the Apocalypse
> > > 12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
> > > with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> > > stars.
> > > 2 She was with ...
> >
> > > (yes a nice babe (angel) works in the supermarket there..)
> >
> > > But since you're all tuned into Pen and Teller Bullsh%t it's of little
> > > consequence.
> >
> > > Herc
> >
> > What in the hell are you jabbering about?
> 
> 2 8 vertex figures superimposed = a 12 vertex figure.
> 
> as seen in the photo I took on 8 August.
> 
> You guys bumped the thread!
> 
> 
> Herc

Take your pills, you f'ing loon.

-- 
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#937
Author: Fidem Turbare, the non-existent ...
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:33
35 lines
3663 bytes 
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:44:53 -0600
Odysseus <odysseus1479-at@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
> In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77817@fidemturbare.com>,
>  "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess" 
>  <goddess@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> > Krevo <aki.karppinen@tut.fi> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>  
> > > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was
> > > 14-basenumbering, and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in
> > > Olympic-Games?
> > 
> > No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
> > 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid
> > number in base 16 because the only available digits are
> > "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to
> > 16 in decimal).
> 
> It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to
> be digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated
> numerals are written; I understood the first statement to say that
> "16" in decimal refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical --
> which is indeed true.

I agree, thanks.  (Normally decimal doesn't need to be indicated, and
typically isn't because of the ambiguity it leads to, plus the
designating letters are normally expressed in lower case.  It was
obviously a mistake to take him literally.)

-- 
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"It's not religion that makes idiots; it's idiots that join religions."
   -- Barry O'Grady (March 5, 2012)
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#938
Author: Graham Cooper
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:56
43 lines
3354 bytes 
[KREVO]
Hexadecimal wants that [16D] = [10H]
but that was 14-base numbering

[ATHEIST GODDESS]
No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid
number in base 16 because the only available digits are
"0123456789ABCDEF" (and if one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to
16 in decimal).

[ODYSSEUS]
It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to
be digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated
numerals are written; I understood the first statement to say that
"16" in decimal refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical --
which is indeed true.

[ATHEIST GODDESS]
I agree, thanks.  (Normally decimal doesn't need to be indicated, and
typically isn't because of the ambiguity it leads to, plus the
designating letters are normally expressed in lower case.  It was
obviously a mistake to take him literally.)


Oh God your correction was for real?

 [16D] = [10H] Hexadecimal

I thought you were taking the piss..

Here's a clue:  and 10H isn't a valid number


Herc
--
http://microPROLOG.com

[mP]-RULE ADDED
[mP]-[happy Dude] if [rich Dude].

[mP]-RULE ADDED
[mP]-[happy Dude] if [drunk Dude].
Re: WHEN DOES [8] + [8] = [12] ?
#944
Author: Fidem Turbare, the non-existent ...
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 05:53
49 lines
3790 bytes 
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> [KREVO]
> Hexadecimal wants that [16D] = [10H]
> but that was 14-base numbering
> 
> [ATHEIST GODDESS]
> No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14.  The number 16D is not equal to
> 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid
> number in base 16 because the only available digits are
> "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to
> 16 in decimal).
> 
> [ODYSSEUS]
> It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to
> be digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated
> numerals are written; I understood the first statement to say that
> "16" in decimal refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical --
> which is indeed true.
> 
> [ATHEIST GODDESS]
> I agree, thanks.  (Normally decimal doesn't need to be indicated, and
> typically isn't because of the ambiguity it leads to, plus the
> designating letters are normally expressed in lower case.  It was
> obviously a mistake to take him literally.)
> 
> 
> Oh God your correction was for real?
> 
>  [16D] = [10H] Hexadecimal

Yes, 16 (16 in decimal) is equal to 10h (10 in hexadecimal).

> I thought you were taking the piss..

I don't understand your comment.

> Here's a clue:  and 10H isn't a valid number

That was my first read on it.  I am interested in finding objective
truth though, and people do make mistakes, so I don't see a problem
with considering corrections in the name of impartiality (at least).

-- 
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Babies are one of my specialties.  Growing up, I performed my own
circumcision."
   -- Dwight Kurt Schrute III
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads