Thread View: alt.comp.periphs.scanner
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by VIP
Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: VIP
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
18 lines
1274 bytes
1274 bytes
Hello, I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a parallel port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is not such a problem. UMAX 1220P CANON FB610 Any known problems of the two? Anyone has got better ones to suggest? Thanks. Please email vip@poboxes.com
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: �p �� ��
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00
27 lines
1507 bytes
1507 bytes
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 22:17:31 +0800, "VIP" <vip@poboxes.com> wrote: >Hello, > >I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a parallel >port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo >scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is >not such a problem. > >UMAX 1220P > >CANON FB610 FB610 ���o��ի��H > >Any known problems of the two? > >Anyone has got better ones to suggest? > >Thanks. > >Please email vip@poboxes.com > > �p�ڤ�
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: Scheldon Pereira
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00
29 lines
1567 bytes
1567 bytes
Another brand to look at is the Optic Pro 9636T Scanner, it has 600x1200dpi as well as a Transparency adapter which you can scan slides and negatives. RRP is $299 for it. VIP <vip@poboxes.com> wrote in article <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>... > Hello, > > I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a parallel > port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo > scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is > not such a problem. > > UMAX 1220P > > CANON FB610 > > Any known problems of the two? > > Anyone has got better ones to suggest? > > Thanks. > > Please email vip@poboxes.com > > > >
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: amara
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00
45 lines
2022 bytes
2022 bytes
Dear VIP
Please have a look at
http://www.abcd.com.au/products/defautl.htm
We have 600x1200 dpi (optical) Artec scanner for $189.
Regards
Amara
Get up to $100 discount for all on line computer orders this week
http://www.abcd.com.au/products/vmp266c.htm - Pentium II celeron
http://www.abcd.com.au/products/vmp300.htm - Pentium II standard
Australian Best Computer Discounts
Visit our shop. Flexisoft Computers, 35, Watton st, Werribee 3030 Vic for
more
Business hours 10:30 am - 6:30 pm, Phone : 03 - 9749 8111 Fax : 03 -9749
8033
http://www.abcd.com.au/
.............
VIP wrote in message <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>...
Hello,
I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a
parallel
port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo
scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed
is
not such a problem.
UMAX 1220P
CANON FB610
Any known problems of the two?
Anyone has got better ones to suggest?
Thanks.
Please email vip@poboxes.com
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: Ken Schweizer
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 00:00
39 lines
2002 bytes
2002 bytes
Try looking at Info Tech FB750. 600x1200 optical ( 9600 interpolated ) with great tech support(even 3 years after the purchase of my original SE6B) Ken Remove NOSPAM from my address On 15 Sep 1998 11:39:52 GMT, "Scheldon Pereira" <srper1hotshot@ozemail.com.au> wrote: >Another brand to look at is the Optic Pro 9636T Scanner, it has 600x1200dpi >as well as a Transparency adapter which you can scan slides and negatives. >RRP is $299 for it. > > >VIP <vip@poboxes.com> wrote in article <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>... >> Hello, >> >> I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a >parallel >> port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo >> scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is >> not such a problem. >> >> UMAX 1220P >> >> CANON FB610 >> >> Any known problems of the two? >> >> Anyone has got better ones to suggest? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Please email vip@poboxes.com >> >> >> >>
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: Wee-Kiat Kong
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00
37 lines
1995 bytes
1995 bytes
I've seen a review by C/NET saying that the Optic Pro 9636T has one of the worst image quality of the scanners in the price range. Apparantly the slightly more expensive Canon FB610 is much better. Wee-Kiat Scheldon Pereira wrote: > > Another brand to look at is the Optic Pro 9636T Scanner, it has 600x1200dpi > as well as a Transparency adapter which you can scan slides and negatives. > RRP is $299 for it. > > > VIP <vip@poboxes.com> wrote in article <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>... > > Hello, > > > > I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a > parallel > > port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo > > scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is > > not such a problem. > > > > UMAX 1220P > > > > CANON FB610 > > > > Any known problems of the two? > > > > Anyone has got better ones to suggest? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Please email vip@poboxes.com > > > > > > > >
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: daniel
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:00
7 lines
1504 bytes
1504 bytes
I bought the Microtek Scanmaker E3 and it has been the easiest part of my PC to install and maintain (its also parallel). It comes with some pretty good software like Kai's Photo Soap. I bought mine about 6 monthes ago for about $350 and it's well worth the money. -Daniel.
Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Author: Nadav
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:00
14 lines
1750 bytes
1750 bytes
I've got the Umax 1220u (same scanner, different interface). I find the bundled software to be thoroughly lame. The Caere OCR software is ancient 16-bit fare with dreadful accuracy, the Presto Pagemanager has a number of annoyances with trying to customize it, and the Adobe Photodeluxe won't let you have more than one scan open at a time (pretty lame when you're trying to combine two scans of something that didn't fit, or you're comparing two scans etc.). If you've got your own softare for editing, then that's a different story. The scanner seems to function fine. Some debate over whether it really is 36-bit, or whether it's 30-bit emulating 36-bit, but you've got to dig into the scanner newsgroup for that. Gabriel
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads