Thread View: comp.sys.next.misc
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by Dick Silbar
Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:53
Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Dick Silbar
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:53
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:53
24 lines
1781 bytes
1781 bytes
Yesterday our group secretary received her new NeXTStation Turbo (monochrome), and I am the designated setter-upper. We got the Turbo running fine as a standalone machine (after moving out the old PC-AT and a few shelves and re-arranging some cords and cables). However, Rachel is one of those vertically challenged people (she's even shorter than I am) and after an hour or so of playing with the machine, her neck started getting tired with all that looking upward. We had mounted the monitor on top of the horizontal slab. OK, we decided, easy to fix by moving the slab out from under the monitor. But, the connector between the two is so short that we ended up putting the slab on its right-hand side, standing up, with the slot for the disk drive at the top. Standing right behind the monitor in the available space, leaning against the wall. A fine solution to an ergonomic AND a real-estate-on-the-desk problem, I thought. The disk drive seems to work that way reasonably well (i.e., not noticeably differently). Then my friend Paul wandered by and he said, "Gee, I'm not sure I'd leave that thing standing up that way..." He didn't explain why. QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's slab standing in its upright position? Dick Silbar
Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: David V. Wallace
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:39
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:39
10 lines
856 bytes
856 bytes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:53:00 GMT From: silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's slab standing in its upright position? How about: o - Dust in the floppy drive? o - It might tip over? o - You'll deprive NeXT of the revenue from selling you a longer cable?
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Todd M. Swan
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:31
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:31
18 lines
1347 bytes
1347 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: > QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's > slab standing in its upright position? Well, back in my PC days (Yes, it was a sad time indeed :-) I wondered the same thing about my AT. I was told that as long as the hard drive was formatted while it was vertical, everything would be fine. Had something to do with gravity's effect on the drive heads. I don't know if this is still true... Todd PS Does the extra 2.5 inches make that much difference? What about a higher chair or lower desk? -- ! "Finally, some good ! Todd M. Swan (ADP-2 - MS P910)! ! software for a PC." ! tms@lanl.gov (NeXTMail) ! ! -- Steve Jobs on ! Los Alamos National Laboratory! ! NeXTstep '486 ! Los Alamos, NM 87545 !
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Ric Mommer
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:13
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:13
35 lines
2284 bytes
2284 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: > ... > Then my friend Paul wandered by and he said, "Gee, I'm not sure I'd leave > that thing standing up that way..." He didn't explain why. > > QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's > slab standing in its upright position? > > Dick Silbar Well, keep in mind the design of the NeXTstation for cooling. The bottom mounted fan is designed to force air over the motherboard. Make sure not to restrict the airflow into the machine. Another consideration is the hard drive. Although it runs fine in the vertical orientation, you should strongly consider reformatting the drive and reinstalling the OS with it vertical. The drive does operate differently sideways (albeit a minute difference) and in my experience with other PCs (Mac and DOS) the hard drive is prone to failure. I distinctly remember a host of technical reasons why, at its introduction, it was not recommended to orient the station on its side. If anyone has more specifics, please post 'em. An easier solution, and the one I would choose, is to simple order the longer monitor cable that ships with the cube ($60 I think) and put the station on a shelf somewhere with good ventilation. Ric Mommer Multimedia Computing Studio University of Iowa DISCLAIMER: These opinions are mine and not those of the University because the University can't afford any opinions at this time. I do believe the Union is negotiating for an increase in opinions. If an agreement is reached regarding the increase in opinioins, I would have to recommend to furlough the opinions until such time the University is more sound. Remember, the University that opinions the least, educates the most.
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Nathan F. Janette
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:21
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:21
14 lines
1090 bytes
1090 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: > > Then my friend Paul wandered by and he said, "Gee, I'm not sure I'd leave > that thing standing up that way..." He didn't explain why. Perhaps you could order the NeXTcube cable, which is much longer then the short NeXTstation cable, and store the station nearby. -- Nathan Janette "I'm a NeXTstep man, Dept MB&B, Yale Univ I'm a NeXTcube guy" New Haven, CT nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (NeXT)
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: CHRIS ZOELLER * ZOELLER
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:36
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:36
53 lines
3498 bytes
3498 bytes
In article <1992Apr10.153133.24410@newshost.lanl.gov>, tms@twins.lanl.gov writes... >In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov >(Dick Silbar) writes: >> QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's >> slab standing in its upright position? > >Well, back in my PC days (Yes, it was a sad time indeed :-) I wondered the same >thing about my AT. I was told that as long as the hard drive was formatted >while it was vertical, everything would be fine. Had something to do with >gravity's effect on the drive heads. I don't know if this is still true... > >Todd >PS Does the extra 2.5 inches make that much difference? What about a higher >chair or lower desk? >-- From: DAC::ZOELLER "CHRIS ZOELLER * ZOELLER@LAMPF.LANL.GOV" 10-APR-1992 10:20:13.19 To: SMTP%"tms@twins.lanl.gov" CC: ZOELLER Subj: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged? >PS Does the extra 2.5 inches make that much difference? What about a higher >chair or lower desk? It's not the magnitude of the gravitational force vector, but the direction it points in that makes the difference. The HD heads are moved in and out radially on a straight line, When you mount the HD vertically, the gravitational force acts in a direction that may bend this straight line movement - the further "out" (towards the center of the disk) the heads are, the more torque is acting on the head guiding mechanism. Seagate specifically says in its HD installation manual not to mount HDs with their front or rear panel pointing up. A side panel pointing up is ok (Why this difference - I don't know, maybe because of some head mechanism details), but as you already said, they ought to be formatted in the position they will be used in. Another problem I can see: There are air guiding/cooling fins under- neath the power supply (at least in the "old" station I have) that channel air towards the fan and also seem to cool the power supply. With the slab not sitting on a flat surface, air flow along those fins will be impaired - may potentially overheat the power supply. Chris -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christoph M "Chris" Zoeller VMS Mail (preferred) Los Alamos National Laboratory Bitnet ZOELLER@LAMPF P-17 (Neutron and Nuclear Science) Internet zoeller@lampf.lanl.gov MS-H803 128.165.53.250 Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA 128.165.53.251 (505) 665-4126 (work) 128.165.53.252 (505) 665-4121 (fax) UNIX Mail zoeller@p17rw1.lanl.gov (505) 662-9497 (home) NeXT Mail Real Soon Now... --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Ronald Pomeroy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:21
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:21
21 lines
1507 bytes
1507 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: [munch munch] >OK, we decided, easy to fix by moving the slab out from under the >monitor. But, the connector between the two is so short that we ended >up putting the slab on its right-hand side, standing up, with the >slot for the disk drive at the top. Standing right behind the monitor [munch munch] >QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's >slab standing in its upright position? > > Dick Silbar The only real concern is head alignment on the internal drive - but I've been running my slab vertial for 5 months now with no problems. Do make sure that the cooling fins on the bottom are against a flat surface. The air drawn by the fan should flow along the full length of the heat sink (fins). Ronald (vertical slabbin' dude) Pomeroy Senior - Electrical Engineering Texas A&M University (I are an AGGIE) n189ds@tamuts.tamu.edu
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Charles Herrick
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:09
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:09
30 lines
1383 bytes
1383 bytes
Dick Silbar writes > Yesterday our group secretary received her new NeXTStation Turbo dang, and us CC's are still running '030's!! WHIIIIINNNNNE!! > (monochrome) oh, well .. ok then :-) [...] > Rachel is one of those vertically challenged people (she's even shorter > than I am) and after an hour or so of playing with the machine, her neck > started getting tired with all that looking upward. We had mounted > the monitor on top of the horizontal slab. Gee, I heard the TURBO's all come with a guarantee of weekly back-rubs from Jeff Martin in Developer Support! Have you filed with bug_next to get Rachel signed up? > putting the slab on its right-hand side, standing up, [...] > QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's > slab standing in its upright position? I've read in several places that hard drives need to remain in the same orientation in which they were formatted. NeXT? chuck
Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Author: Bradley Head
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:04
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:04
25 lines
1511 bytes
1511 bytes
Dick Silbar writes > Yesterday our group secretary received her new NeXTStation Turbo > (monochrome), and I am the designated setter-upper. We got the Turbo > running fine as a standalone machine (after moving out the old PC-AT > and a few shelves and re-arranging some cords and cables). However, > Rachel is one of those vertically challenged people (she's even shorter > than I am) and after an hour or so of playing with the machine, her neck > started getting tired with all that looking upward. We had mounted > the monitor on top of the horizontal slab. > Perhaps a better solution would be to: 1. Get a longer monitor cable - ask NeXT. 2. Rachel's table/desk is too high. 3. Rachel is sitting too low - forearms should be parallel with floor ...Brad -- Bradley Head, bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (NeXTmail :-) InStep Mobile Communications, Inc., Headfirst Software Ltd. Executive of Vancouver NeXT User's Society, Vancouver, BC.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads