🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
By: foolsrushin on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:56

Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
By: Androcles on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:43

Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
By: Pmb on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:32

Re: "The Key"
By: foolsrushin. on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:43

Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
By: Randy Poe on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:37

Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
By: macarone on Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:45

Re: why relativists are using different names to same thing?
By: foolsrushin on Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:37

Re: simultaneity
By: foolsrushin. on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:56

Re: simultaneity
By: rbwinn on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:21

Re: simultaneity
By: foolsrushin. on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:13

Re: simultaneity
By: rbwinn on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:40

Re: simultaneity
By: foolsrushin. on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:30

Re: simultaneity
By: foolsrushin. on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:21

Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
By: foolsrushin on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:46

Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
By: foolsrushin. on Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:51

Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
By: zzbunker on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:24

Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
By: foolsrushin. on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:51

Re: [OT] Re: Rainbows only exist on Earth
By: Sanforized on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:26

Re: [OT] Re: Rainbows only exist on Earth
By: Sanforized on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:16

Re: [OT] Re: Rainbows only exist on Earth
By: Jon Green on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:27

Re: [OT] Re: Rainbows only exist on Earth
By: The TimeLord on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:01

Re: [OT] Re: Rainbows only exist on Earth
By: Sanforized on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:22

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: Sanforized on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:26

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: foolsrushin on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:09

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: Sanforized on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:51

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: foolsrushin. on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:01

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: foolsrushin. on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:39

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: George Hammond on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:58

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: George Hammond on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:56

Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
By: Sanforized on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:02

Re: THE BAILOUT
By: foolsrushin. on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:59

Re: THE BAILOUT
By: marika on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:35

Re: THE BAILOUT
By: foolsrushin on Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:47

Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
By: foolsrushin on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:26

Re: General Relativity and the New Age Religion
By: UncleEnglish on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 06:34

Re: The three magi and the religious proof of relativity.
By: UncleEnglish on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 06:05

Re: General Relativity and the New Age Religion
By: foolsrushin on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 05:36

Re: A basically a reliable UFO website
By: foolsrushin on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:27

Re: A basically a reliable UFO website
By: UncleEnglish on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:47

Re: Anthropic Principle Implies Omphalic Bible Creation
By: UncleEnglish on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:19

Re: Anthropic Principle Implies Omphalic Bible Creation
By: John J on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:55

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: ben6993 on Sat, 01 May 2010 07:48

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: ben6993 on Sat, 01 May 2010 07:26

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: John Murphy on Sat, 01 May 2010 04:13

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: BURT on Sat, 01 May 2010 02:08

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: John Murphy on Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:14

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: BURT on Sat, 01 May 2010 17:35

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: BURT on Tue, 04 May 2010 04:01

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: John Murphy on Mon, 03 May 2010 22:51

Re: Station's clock with respect to the train
By: John Murphy on Tue, 11 May 2010 01:53

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: Peter Paul Schuttevaar on Sun, 02 Aug 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: Robin Becker on Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: John Creighton on Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: Erwin Lalik on Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: Jim Takeda on Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: Jan Bielawski on Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: C. Hillman on Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00

Re: Is the Universe a Computer
By: ande452 on Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00

Is the Universe a Computer
By: John Creighton on Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00

WWW: JOBS & MEETINGS in physics and related areas
By: Mikko Karttunen on Sat, 22 Feb 1997 00:00

Re: Relativity as a religion
By: Dirk Van de moortel on Sun, 06 Jun 2004 08:02

Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
By: bv_schornak on Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:56

Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
By: George Hammond on Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:27

Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
By: bv_schornak on Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:05

Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
By: George Hammond on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:49

WINDOWS UPDATES
By: Chadwick Richard on Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:05

Re: Worshipping celebrities 'brings success'
By: [#] Mining Pioneer on Tue, 02 Sep 2003 02:33

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: Virgil on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:49

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: |-| E R C on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:58

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: WM on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:37

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: Graham Cooper on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:57

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: Graham Cooper on Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:18

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: WM on Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:45

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: Graham Cooper on Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:17

Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
By: Graham Cooper on Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:38

Re: If Computers Ran The World....
By: artful on Thu, 23 Sep 2010 03:50

If Computers Ran The World....
By: .. on Thu, 23 Sep 2010 03:48

Re: If Computers Ran The World....
By: dlzc on Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:52

Re: If Computers Ran The World....
By: .. on Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:44

Re: GOD= G_uv = -k (%Brain Growth)
By: ..andnothingbut on Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:05

Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI
By: Doc Smartass on Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:00

Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI
By: Uncle Vic on Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:23

Re: THE USENET STALKERAZZI
By: George Hammond on Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:37

Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
By: Phineas T Puddleduck on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:27

Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
By: George Hammond on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:16

Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
By: Phineas T Puddleduck on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:13

Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
By: George Hammond on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:41

Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
By: Autymn D. C. on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:27

Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
By: George Hammond on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 05:52

Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
By: Otto Bahn on Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:26

Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
By: jesshc on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:25

Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
By: George Hammond on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:19

Re: IRREFUTABLE FACTOR-ANALYTIC-RELATIVITY PROOF OF GOD
By: John Dorsay on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:04

Re: IRREFUTABLE FACTOR-ANALYTIC-RELATIVITY PROOF OF GOD
By: George Hammond on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:54

Re: IRREFUTABLE FACTOR-ANALYTIC-RELATIVITY PROOF OF GOD
By: John Dorsay on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:26

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: DanielSan on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:01

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: microm2011 on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:09

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: Vurgil on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:51

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: Malte Runz on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:11

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: Paul David Wright on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:35

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: Paul David Wright on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:35

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: Paul David Wright on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:32

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: DanielSan on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:53

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: microm2011 on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:50

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: DanielSan on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:30

Re: Intelligent design reflects the dimness of its claimants
By: microm2011 on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:21

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: John Gogo on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:45

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: John Gogo on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:43

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: John Gogo on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:24

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: microm2011 on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:21

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: John Gogo on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:13

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: microm2011 on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:53

Re: Intelligent Design exhibits only proof by assertion, but lacks any supporting objective evidence
By: Vurgil on Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:18

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's neither extreme! B^D
By: Uirgil on Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:06

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's irrelevant to both! B^D
By: fasgnadh on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:46

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's irrelevant to both! B^D
By: fasgnadh on Sun, 01 Apr 2012 07:34

Re:Religion Is a Fatal Sickness
By: Uirgil on Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:05

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's irrelevant to both! B^D
By: Fred Hall on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:47

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's irrelevant to both! B^D
By: fasgnadh on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:18

Re: Extremism for Science? Science is not extreme, merely organized common sense!
By: Uirgil on Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:54

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's neither extreme! B^D
By: fasgnadh on Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:16

Re: And here's the *other* reason why Fasgnadh is afraid to debate honestly... He doesn't know what honesty is!
By: Uirgil on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:26

Re: And here's the *other* reason why atheists are afraid to debate Fasgnadh... Atheists can't manage simple LOGIC
By: fasgnadh on Thu, 05 Apr 2012 23:36

Re: Extremism for Science and Religion.. atheism doesn't even rate a mention.. it's irrelevant to both! B^D
By: fasgnadh on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:52

Ravin the Rhode Island Red hen demonstrates how not to debate as he snips and runs away! B^D
By: fasgnadh on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:40

Re: -- Extremism for fasgnadh, but no evidence for any gods (repost)
By: Fred Hall on Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:19

-- Extremism for fasgnadh, but no evidence for any gods (repost)
By: dolf on Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:13

-- Extremism for fasgnadh, but no evidence for any gods
By: dolf on Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:48