🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Quantum Gravity 240.5: Quantum Gravity "Demolished" At University of Oregon USA
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:54

Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 262)
By: hanson on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:29

Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 262)
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:11

Re: Quantum Gravity 240.8: How "Causal" Is General Relativity?
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:36

Re: Quantum Gravity 240.8: How "Causal" Is General Relativity?
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:02

Re: Quantum Gravity 240.5: Quantum Gravity "Demolished" At University of Oregon USA
By: OsherD on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:12

Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 262)
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:54

Re: Quantum Gravity 243.5: Quantum Gravity Debate Appears To Leave Only Newton and Faraday/Ampere Standing
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:55

Re: Quantum Gravity 243.5: Quantum Gravity Debate Appears To Leave Only Newton and Faraday/Ampere Standing
By: OsherD on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:54

Re: Quantum Gravity 243.5: Quantum Gravity Debate Appears To Leave Only Newton and Faraday/Ampere Standing
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:18

Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 263)
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:06

Re: LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:24

Re: LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:00

Re: LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:54

Re: LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:30

Re: LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 09 Apr 2011 07:14

Re: LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:30

LE PHOTON DIT-IL BONJOUR AU CHAMP DE GRAVITATION?
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:24

Shockley's widow abducted and expropriated under false conservatorship
By: Daniel on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:14

Crystalline vacuum (David Ritz Finkelstein et al)
By: patanie on Wed, 13 Jan 1999 00:00

Re: Crystalline vacuum (David Ritz Finkelstein et al)
By: Todd Desiato on Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00

Re: Crystalline vacuum (David Ritz Finkelstein et al)
By: Tom Potter on Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00

Re: Crystalline vacuum (David Ritz Finkelstein et al)
By: patanie on Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00

The electron seen for the first time
By: Robert Sturm on Tue, 25 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Michael Kagalenko on Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Jim Goodman on Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Vertner Vergon on Tue, 25 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Vertner Vergon on Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Vertner Vergon on Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: lgmdmdlsr on Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Vertner Vergon on Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Francois Meyer on Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00

Re: The electron seen for the first time
By: Jim Goodman on Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Alfred Einstead on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:21

Re: A second "big bang"
By: radowning on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:29

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Uncle Al on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:35

Re: A second "big bang"
By: TomB on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:39

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Spaceman on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:00

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Green Dehydrated Amphibian on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:29

Re: A second "big bang"
By: George Kinley on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 07:43

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Bill Vajk on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 07:46

A second "big bang"
By: The Dark Doctor on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 05:39

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:25

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Thanatos on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:16

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Dale A Trynor on Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:48

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Minor Crank on Wed, 05 Feb 2003 06:09

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 23:01

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:58

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Indestructible Truth Holder on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:58

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Chosp on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:54

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Indestructible Truth Holder on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:45

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Indestructible Truth Holder on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:40

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Joseph Lazio on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:12

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Joseph Lazio on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:08

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Chosp on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 01:17

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Spaceman on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:59

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:43

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Spaceman on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:38

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:09

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Spaceman on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:54

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:18

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Mark Folsom on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:11

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Indestructible Truth Holder on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:30

Re: A second "big bang"
By: George Dishman on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:01

Re: A second "big bang"
By: George Dishman on Sun, 09 Feb 2003 14:06

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Dale A Trynor on Sun, 09 Feb 2003 06:36

Re: A second "big bang"
By: George Dishman on Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:29

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Dale A Trynor on Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:15

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Joseph Lazio on Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:03

Re: A second "big bang"
By: George Dishman on Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:28

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Dale A Trynor on Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:13

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Shrikantha S. Shastry on Sun, 23 Mar 2003 07:10

Re: A second "big bang"
By: Ole D. Rughede on Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:56

International Journal of Modern Physics D - Vol 13 No 2
By: WSPC on Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:22

International Journal of Modern Physics D - Vol 13 No 3
By: WSPC on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 04:34

NEWTON VS EINSTEIN : our true direction our true speed
By: Yanick Toutain on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:51

Re: WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
By: Yanick Toutain on Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:14

Re: WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
By: Yanick Toutain on Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:57

Re: WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
By: myravian on Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:36

Re: variable motions
By: myravian on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:23

Re: 3 KINDS OF SPEEDS : OBJECTIVE SPEED is the ONLY SPEED.3 SORTES DE VITESSES : LA VITESSE OBJECTIVE est la SEULE VITESSE.
By: Yanick Toutain on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:24

Re: variable motions
By: Yanick Toutain on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:19

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:18

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:23

Re: PROVERBES ABSURDES DE L'ORTHODOXIE TRIOMPHANTE ! (et de ses pourfendeurs) N°3
By: Marco Paulo on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:13

Wormley and the constancy of the speed of cars on Ford assemply lines
By: Androcles on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:53

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:54

Re: PROVERBES ABSURDES DE L'ORTHODOXIE TRIOMPHANTE ! (et de ses pourfendeurs) N�3
By: Oncle Dom on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:35

Re: PROVERBES ABSURDES DE L'ORTHODOXIE TRIOMPHANTE ! (et de ses pourfendeurs) N°3
By: Marc Girod on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:24

Re: PROVERBES ABSURDES DE L'ORTHODOXIE TRIOMPHANTE ! (et de ses pourfendeurs) N�3
By: Oncle Dom on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:11

Re: PROVERBES ABSURDES DE L'ORTHODOXIE TRIOMPHANTE ! (et de ses pourfendeurs) N°3
By: menerlach on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:08

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:45

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Eric Gisse on Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:01

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:58

PROVERBS N°3
By: Yanick Toutain on Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:55

PROVERBES ABSURDES DE L'ORTHODOXIE TRIOMPHANTE ! (et de ses pourfendeurs) N°3
By: Yanick Toutain on Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:50

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Androcles on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:32

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Randy Poe on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:42

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Androcles on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:36

Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:42

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: alainverghote on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:50

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: uglyvan on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:47

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: marc.eyrole on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:03

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: uglyvan on Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:06

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: marc.eyrole on Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:21

Re: Le fait de savoir si le Pôle Nord est en avant du Pôle Sud est une question, paraît-il, sans objet. (Il semble que ce soit, ...
By: steux.m on Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:29

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: uglyvan on Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:36

Re: Il est hérétique de penser que le Soleil n'est pas là où on le voit : Il ne faut croire que ce que l'on voit ! N° 5
By: uglyvan on Sun, 05 Aug 2007 07:12

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: marc.eyrole on Sun, 05 Aug 2007 06:43

Re: Il est h�r�tique de penser que le Soleil n'est pas l� o� on le voit : Il ne faut croire que ce que l'on voit ! N� 5
By: Oncle Dom on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:12

Re: Il est hérétique de penser que le Soleil n'est pas là où on le voit : Il ne faut croire que ce que l'on voit ! N° 5
By: Shadowland on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:05

Re: Il est h�r�tique de penser que le Soleil n'est pas l� o� on le voit : Il ne faut croire que ce que l'on voit ! N� 5
By: vincent.thiernesse on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:34

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: lucien.coste on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:12

Re: Il est h�r�tique de penser que le Soleil n'est pas l� o� on le voit : Il ne faut croire que ce que l'on voit ! N� 5
By: Oncle Dom on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:12

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: Oncle Dom on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:08

Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: Yanick Toutain on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:59

Il est hérétique de penser que le Soleil n'est pas là où on le voit : Il ne faut croire que ce que l'on voit ! N° 5
By: Yanick Toutain on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:54

Le fait de savoir si le Pôle Nord est en avant du Pôle Sud est une question, paraît-il, sans objet. (Il semble que ce soit, nett...
By: Yanick Toutain on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:52

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: philippus on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:09

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: uglyvan on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:17

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: uglyvan on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:14

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: Oncle Dom on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:14

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: orange.ch on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:24

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: Oncle Dom on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:58

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: Oncle Dom on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:57

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N° 6
By: Kefran on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:31

Re: Pour certains, le vide n'existe pas : IL Y A TOUJOURS QUELQUE CHOSES DEDANS ! N� 6
By: orange.ch on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:34

Re: Differences RT vs Newton
By: Yanick Toutain on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:28