🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:07

Re: LEE SMOLIN AGAINST ISAAC NEWTON
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:20

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Igor on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:33

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: dedanoe on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:56

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: R. Josh iii on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:12

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Yanick Toutain on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:22

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:36

Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton
By: Josef Matz on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:30

Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton
By: Josef Matz on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:44

HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:55

Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT AND RELATIVISTIC VERBIAGE
By: Johnnie In The Billows on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:42

Re: EXTREMELY SILLY EINSTEINIANS
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:17

Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT AND RELATIVISTIC VERBIAGE
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:25

Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton
By: G. L. Bradford on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:58

Re: THE ROT EINSTEIN HAS STARTED
By: Johnnie In The Billows on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:01

Re: Relativity needs correction the facts part 2 - Unification of Einstein and Newton
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:28

Re: THE ROT EINSTEIN HAS STARTED
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:20

Re: ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA WRITTEN BY EINSTEIN ZOMBIES
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:07

Re: THE ROT EINSTEIN HAS STARTED
By: Robert J. Kolker on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:19

DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS IN NATURAL SCIENCES
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:28

Re: ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA WRITTEN BY EINSTEIN ZOMBIES
By: Helmut Wabnig on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:38

Re: EINSTEINIANS HINT AT....WHAT?
By: Helmut Wabnig on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:16

Re: EINSTEINIANS HINT AT....WHAT?
By: HW Henri Wilson on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:50

Re: EINSTEINIANS HINT AT....WHAT?
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:27

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:05

Re: EINSTEINIANS HINT AT....WHAT?
By: Helmut Wabnig on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:44

EINSTEINIANS HINT AT....WHAT?
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:08

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Josef Matz on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:53

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: R. Josh iii on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:05

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:25

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:50

Re: PERIMETER INSTITUTE: KEY TEXTS FROM EINSTEIN
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:28

Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
By: Dono on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:28

Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
By: R. Josh iii on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:22

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Josef Matz on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:09

Re: LEE SMOLIN AGAINST ISAAC NEWTON
By: Lady Chacha on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:59

Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
By: Lady Chacha on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:57

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:46

Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
By: caliber on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:42

Re: STEVE CARLIP AND IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA
By: Dono on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:32

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Sam Wormley on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:24

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: G. L. Bradford on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:17

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Michael Helland on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:46

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Sam Wormley on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:49

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Michael Helland on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:04

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:53

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:25

NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:11

Re: EINSTEINIANS HINT AT....WHAT?
By: JanPB on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:18

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Androcles on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:29

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Androcles on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:28

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: PD on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:42

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Androcles on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:34

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: PD on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:18

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Androcles on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:35

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:35

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: PD on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:57

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: G. L. Bradford on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:12

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:09

EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:51

Re: BRIAN GREENE: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIAN
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:36

Re: BRIAN GREENE: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIAN
By: diego on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:23

Re: BRIAN GREENE: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIAN
By: hhc314 on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:40

BRIAN GREENE: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIAN
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:00

Re: LEE SMOLIN AGAINST ISAAC NEWTON
By: Androcles on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:12

Re: LEE SMOLIN AGAINST ISAAC NEWTON
By: Eric Baird on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:09

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Juan R. González-Álvarez on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:29

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:12

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:45

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Michael Helland on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:35

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: latente on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:10

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: latente on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:08

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Daryl McCullough on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:52

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Sam Wormley on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:05

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: tantal on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:02

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: tantal on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:00

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Sam Wormley on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:57

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: tantal on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:47

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:44

Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
By: Pentcho Valev on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:12

Re: WHAT THERMODYNAMICISTS HAVE TAUGHT FOR 140 YEARS
By: hhc314 on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:54

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Randy Poe on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:29

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Artful on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:18

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Dead Paul on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:42

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Artful on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:27

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Dead Paul on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:33

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:55

Re: WHAT THERMODYNAMICISTS HAVE TAUGHT FOR 140 YEARS
By: zzbunker on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:20

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: Androcles on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:28

WHAT THERMODYNAMICISTS HAVE TAUGHT FOR 140 YEARS
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:39

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: xxein on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:34

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: Androcles on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:04

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: xxein on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:36

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: xxein on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:35

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: Androcles on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:49

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: xxein on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:39

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: maxwell on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:27

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
By: Pentcho Valev on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:25

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Dono on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:19

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: R. Josh iii on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:15

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:02

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: R. Josh iii on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:18

Re: BRIAN GREENE: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIAN
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:48

THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Pentcho Valev on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:26

Re: DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS IN NATURAL SCIENCES
By: Pentcho Valev on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:33

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: hhc314 on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:51

Re: relativity, anger, swearing
By: Igor on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:25

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Tom Potter on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:25

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Rudolf Drabek on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:56

Re: DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS IN NATURAL SCIENCES
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:13

Re: DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS IN NATURAL SCIENCES
By: philippus on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:37

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Josef Matz on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:33

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Denis Feldmann on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:06

Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
By: Pentcho Valev on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:07

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Rudolf Drabek on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:47

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Sue... on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:39

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Denis Feldmann on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:17

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Sue... on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:54

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Denis Feldmann on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:31

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Rudolf Drabek on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:10

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Richard Hachel on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: R. Josh iii on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:42

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Dono on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:38

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Dono on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:33

Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:51

Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
By: Pentcho Valev on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:13

Re: ON NE BRULERA PAS LE LIVRE DE JEAN EISENSTAEDT!
By: Pentcho Valev on Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52

Re: ON NE BRULERA PAS LE LIVRE DE JEAN EISENSTAEDT!
By: R. Josh iii on Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:59